Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2080/5338
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohanty, Soumya Ranjan-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Kishore Singh-
dc.contributor.authorNaik, B. Kiran-
dc.contributor.authorChandorkar, Shoma-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T13:01:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-22T13:01:12Z-
dc.date.issued2025-10-
dc.identifier.citation1st International conference on Thermofluids Engineering (INCOTHERM), IIT (ISM), Dhanbad, 10–11 October 2025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2080/5338-
dc.descriptionCopyright belongs to the proceeding publisher.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe second-order analysis of Stirling cryocoolers (SC) involves idealistic predictions of the cooling effect and coefficient of performance (COP) using the equation of state, ideal isentropic compression, and isothermal expansions. However, the previous analyses incorporated several unreasonable approximations to aggregate the temperature variations. For example, the temperature variation in a regenerative heat exchanger is expressed as a logarithmic mean of the compressor and expansion temperatures. As a result, the previous second-order studies over-predict the ideal COP of the cryocooler. The regenerative heat exchanger is one of the critical components in SC design. Therefore, a comprehensive model for the regenerator temperature variations is necessary to make the predictions accurate. The present approach incorporates one-dimensional temperature variation of the regenerator's mesh matrix into the second-order analysis, which is obtained by solving the heat balance equation. The model incorporates variations in mass flow rate and thermophysical properties of the working fluid, which previous studies have ignored. The current approach predicts a lesser cooling effect (4% less) and COP (1.5% less) than the earlier findings, which brings the prediction closer to reality. Further, the variations in cooling effect and COP with different phase angles (α) and expansion temperatures (TE) are explored, and the optimal phase angle for maximum COP is found between 80 - 90 degree.en_US
dc.subjectStirling cryocooleren_US
dc.subjectCyclic second-order analysisen_US
dc.subjectRegenerator temperature correctionsen_US
dc.subjectCOPen_US
dc.titleStirling Cryocooler Modeling Using Regenerator Temperature Corrected Second-Order Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2025_INCOTHERM_SRMohanty_Stirling.pdf573.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.