Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPanigrahi, Premananda-
dc.contributor.authorMaity, Somnath-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON 2017, Penang, Malaysia, 5 - 8 November, 2017en_US
dc.descriptionCopyright of this paper belongs to proceedings publisher.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on identification of vulnerable lines and nodes of the power grid (PG) network whose removal disrupt on its operational capability. Here the topological parameters are derived from CN theory, and these are used to identify the most important elements i.e., lines and nodes of the PGs. Based on this concept, the number of attack strategies are illustrated and also applied to different IEEE bus networks, e.g., IEEE 39 and 300 buses. We show that in case of electrical PG network, weights are related to electric concepts, and that can enhance the representation of the PG. This work identifies the vulnerable lines and nodes of both weighted and unweighted networks, and quantify the results by applying the concept to real AC power flow model. We conclude that a weighted network analysis can give a better vulnerability assessment than that of an unweighted network.en_US
dc.subjectCascading failuresen_US
dc.subjectCentrality metricsen_US
dc.subjectComplex systemsen_US
dc.subjectPhysical attacksen_US
dc.subjectAC OPFen_US
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Weighted and Unweighted Power Grid Networksen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2017_TENCON_PPanigrahi_A Comparative.pdfConference Paper154.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.