Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2080/5231
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNandi, Riju-
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Arnab-
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Krishna-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-17T11:22:28Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-17T11:22:28Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-
dc.identifier.citationIEEE North-East India International Energy Conversion Conference and Exhibition (NE-IECCE), NIT Silchar, 4-6 July 2025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2080/5231-
dc.descriptionCopyright belongs to the proceeding publisher.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares seven different control methods on DC-DC Bidirectional Buck-Boost Converter (BDC). Several control methods, like PID, 1-DOF PID, 2-DOF PID, 3-DOF PID, Lag-lead, Lead-lead, and Lead-lag, are used to control the BDC. The results show the capability of control methods to improve the functioning of the converters mentioned above. The converter's performance is achieved using various control strategies applied to fluctuations in supply voltage and varying load conditions. Lead-lead control is prominent among the tested algorithms, offering rapid response, minimal overshoot, and outstanding steady-state performance.en_US
dc.subjectBDCen_US
dc.subjectPIDen_US
dc.subjectDOFen_US
dc.subjectLeaden_US
dc.titleComparative Analysis of Control methods for Enhancing the performance of the Bidirectional DCDC Buck-Boost Converteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2025_NEIECCE_RNandi_Comparative.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.