Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2080/4814
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoudhury, Ayan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-17T05:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-17T05:24:55Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Conference on Stories matter:(RE)-Thinking Narratives Aesthetics and Human Values, Banaras Hindu University India, 06 December 2024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2080/4814-
dc.descriptionCopyright belongs to the proceeding publisheren_US
dc.description.abstractThe partition of India in 1947 that transgressed both the geographical and cultural boundaries left millions of people homeless and victims of communal violence. Like other media that presented the horror of partition, little magazines, too, responded to the postpartition socio-cultural upheaval. Despite being the “Other” to mainstream printing practices, little magazines became socially pungent and attentive critique of the socio-political milieu of the state. Bangla little magazines promoted a body of partition literature which was often side-lined by the mainstream magazines and academia. These “non-commercial” magazines circulated and popularised “subaltern” voices of the refugees and other vulnerable sections of the society. They contemporised the history of partition through critiquing the burning issues such as citizenship, vulnerability, and development of the minority even after seventy-five years of independence. They aimed to rewrite the history of “independence” as the history of “partition” which was replete with suffering, agony, death, and massacre to discontinue with the tradition of glorifying “independence” in the contemporary printing culture. This paper explores the trajectories of politics and culture in which these small presses conceptualised “partition” both as a historical event and literary representation that revived the cultural amnesia to reproduce an alternative storehouse of counter narratives. Moreover, focusing on the paratexts, it decodes the aesthetic paradigms of these “advance guard” magazines to understand their representational politics. In short, this paper relocates “partition” within the network of Bangla little magazines and its alternative printing culturesen_US
dc.subjectPartitionen_US
dc.subjectLiteratureen_US
dc.subjectBangla Little Magazinesen_US
dc.titlePartition in Bangla Little Magazines: Visualising History through Literatureen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2024_AChoudhury_Partition.pdfPresentation1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.