Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2080/3399
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Partha Sarathi-
dc.contributor.authorMaparu, Tuhin Subhra-
dc.contributor.authorMuhuri, Soumi-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-23T11:15:50Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-23T11:15:50Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-
dc.identifier.citationThe International Conference on Future Cities (ICFC 2019) Roorkee, India, 11-13 December 2019.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2080/3399-
dc.descriptionCopyright of this document belongs to proceedings publisher.en_US
dc.description.abstractConserving all architectural heritages may not be feasible in future cities. Hence, for future cities, what to retain from the past is a big question to solve. Proclaiming architectural heritage needs some background study of the parameters which significantly influences the heritage in many ways. Therefore, this study acknowledges the relative values of parameters to validate the role of the architectural heritage for conservation. This study also focuses on the level of importance of the parameters while evaluating the architectural heritage. In the process of evaluation of architectural heritage, the identified literature is obtained from three sources - international organizations, government agencies, and architectural heritage scholars. More or less, all the studies have given their parameters for evaluating architectural heritage by the traditional, chronological, and geographical concepts which are relevant for a region. Commencing the literature review, ‘Architectural and Aesthetic Value’ is found to be a prime dimension while evaluating the architectural heritage. A methodology has been adopted to get its sub-dimensions and parameters which can help in assessing the architectural heritage in terms of its ‘Architectural and Aesthetic Value.’ To get the quality of parameters and their relative importance, a Delphi Technique has been adopted through conducting surveys of the experts of the architecture and other allied fields. Further, various statistical weightage techniques are compared for the better assessment of the built heritage. The results of the research show the relative importance of the parameters while selecting the architectural heritage, specifically its ‘Architectural and Aesthetic Value.’ The results would also help in evaluating other dimensions of architectural heritage and expand the scope for future research in prioritizing the architectural heritage for the benefit of society.en_US
dc.subjectArchitectural Heritageen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural and Aesthetic Valueen_US
dc.subjectRanking of Parametersen_US
dc.subjectWeightage of Parametersen_US
dc.subjectDelphi Techniqueen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of ‘Architectural and Aesthetic Value’ of Built Heritage: A Comparison of Weightage Methodsen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2019_ICFC_PSMishra_EvaluationArchitectural.pdfPresentation1.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
2019_ICFC_PSMishra_EvaluationArchitectural_.pdfConference Paper824.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.