Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2080/3349
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Munshi, Basudeb | - |
dc.contributor.author | Panda, Swaraj | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Arvind | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-18T05:31:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-18T05:31:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 4th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Economics( ICEEE2019) Edinburgh, UK, 20-22 August 2019. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2080/3349 | - |
dc.description | Copyright of this document belongs to proceedings publisher. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In the present world, Scientists are very much concern on to reduce the concentration level of carbon dioxide in environment to save the world. In the present work, the CO2 capturing efficiencies of three different amine solvents were analyzed. The selected solvents were mono-ethanol amine (MEA), solvent containing mixture of methyl diethanol amine (MDEA) and piperazine (PZ) called activated -MDEA and aqueous ammonia (NH3) solution. Rigorous simulation method was considered in the current study. The effects of different key parameters for different solvents on the CO2 removal efficiency were analyzed. Packing height, solvent temperature and absorber height were the significant influential parameters for MEA system whereas for activated-MDEA (a-MDEA), those are the ratio of the solvent to feed quantity and the mixed solvent PZ concentration level. For aqueous NH3 solution, absorber and stripper’s temperature, CO2 loading, concentration of NH3, height of the absorber, lean and rich solvent flow rate, boil up ratio, regeneration energy, temperature of the condenser, and duty of the reboiler were considered. The comparative study showed that MEA process recovered the maximum CO2 from flue gas. But it was suffered by the maximum regeneration duty. a-MDEA with PZ recovered 91% CO2. Overall, technically, a-MDEA was the best choice as solvent. Compared to a-MDEA and MEA, aqueous ammonia was identified as more propitious and environment friendly solvent due to its satisfactory performance and easy availability. | en_US |
dc.subject | CO2 | en_US |
dc.subject | Power Plant | en_US |
dc.subject | Amines | en_US |
dc.title | Modelling and Simulation Study of CO2 Capturing Process in Coal Fired Power Plant using Various Amine Solvents | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019_ICEEE_AKumar_Modelling.pdf | Conference paper | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.