Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2080/2499
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dumpa, G | - |
dc.contributor.author | Acharya, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dan, T K | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-02T04:23:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-02T04:23:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-04 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 5th International Conference On Computation of Power, Energy, Information and Communication(ICCPEIC 2016) Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 20-21 April 2016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2080/2499 | - |
dc.description | Copyright belongs to proceeding publisher | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This paper provides a comparative analysis of different control strategies used to control the top and bottom product of binary distillation column. Classical Wood and Berry model has been considered as the model of distillation column and the controller is designed considering a non-interacting process. Performance evaluation of different controllers such as internal model controller (IMC), lead-lag IMC, smith predictorIMC and feed forward IMC controller has been carried out in this paper. Set point regulation and disturbance rejection property of the controller is evaluated. | en_US |
dc.subject | IMC | en_US |
dc.subject | Distillation column | en_US |
dc.subject | Lead-lag IMC | en_US |
dc.subject | Smith predictor | en_US |
dc.subject | Feed forward IMC | en_US |
dc.title | Comparative Analysis of Different Control Techniques for A Distillation Column | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-ICCPEIC_Dumpa_Comprataive.pdf | 778.99 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.